Parte del Focus "Nuove tecnologie e Intelligenza artificiale. Sfide per la pianificazione"
a cura di Adriano Bisello e Michele Grimaldi
DdA/Università G. D’Annunzio
DdA/Università G. D’Annunzio
INGEO/Università G.D’Annunzio
L’integrazione dell’intelligenza artificiale generativa nella pianificazione urbana offre opportunità innovative per affrontare le sfide del XXI secolo, come il cambiamento climatico e l’inclusione sociale. Tuttavia, sorgono interrogativi su come equilibrare il progresso tecnologico con l’azione umana e l’etica. Il progetto "Smart City Digital Twin" di Helsinki illustra come i gemelli digitali possano migliorare la pianificazione urbana attraverso simulazioni e coinvolgimento cittadino. Tuttavia, emergono sfide legate a privacy, costi e inclusione digitale. Esperienze come Virtual Singapore mostrano come i gemelli digitali possano supportare decisioni strategiche basate su dati, ma evidenziano il rischio di un’eccessiva dipendenza dalla tecnologia. Per un’implementazione efficace, è essenziale bilanciare innovazione e partecipazione pubblica, garantendo trasparenza e sostenibilità.
Batty M. (2018), Inventing Future Cities, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kitchin R., Dodge M. (2011), Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Albino V., Berardi U., Dangelico R.M. (2015), “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives”, Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 3–21.
Townsend A. (2013), Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia, W.W. Norton & Company, New York.
Calzada I., Cobo C. (2015), “Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart City”, Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 23-43.
Morozov E., Bria F. (2018), Rethinking the Smart City: Democratizing Urban Technology, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Berlino.
Graham S., Marvin S. (2001), Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, Routledge, Londra.
Rabari C., Storper M. (2015), “The Digital Skin of Cities: Urban Theory and Research in the Age of the Sensored and Metered City”, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 27-42.
Hollands R. G. (2008), “Will the Real Smart City Please Stand Up? Intelligent, Progressive or Entrepreneurial?”, City, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 303–320.
Söderström O., Paasche T., Klauser F. (2014), “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling”, City, vol. 18, no. 3, p. 307-320.
Helsinki Smart City Consortium (2021), “Helsinki’s Smart City Digital Twin: Implementing Sustainable and Participatory Urban Planning Solutions”, Annual Review of Smart Urbanism, Helsinki Smart City Consortium, Helsinki, 3 march 2021.
City of Helsinki Urban Environment Division (2020), “Helsinki Digital Twin Initiative: Leveraging 3D Models and AI for Urban Sustainability and Resilience”, Journal of Urban Technology and Innovation.
Singapore Land Authority (2023), “Virtual Singapore: Integrating AI and 3D Modeling for Enhanced Urban Governance”, Proceedings of the Smart Cities Conference, Singapore Land Authority, Singapore, 19 august 2023.
Foo J., Tan M. (2019), “Virtual Singapore as a Smart Nation Model: Digital Twin Applications in Policy Simulation and Citizen Engagement”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research.
Krause M., Wong J. (2022), “Virtual Singapore: A Digital Twin for Strategic Urban Planning and Public Participation”, in Smart City Initiatives in Southeast Asia, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 26 october 2022.
