Parte della SESSIONE PARALLELA 1: L’APPROCCIO ECOSISTEMICO ALLA PIANIFICAZIONE SPAZIALE / THE ECOSYSTEM APPROACH TO SPATIAL PLANNING. Coordinatori: Silvio Cristiano, Corrado Zoppi Discussant: Claudia De Luca
Department of Architecture, University of Bologna
Department of Architecture, University of Bologna
Department of Architecture, University of Bologna
Department of Architecture, University of Bologna
Cultural landscapes across Europe face major challenges due to climate change and the subsequent increase of floods, heatwaves and landslides. Regulating ecosystem services (ES) play a crucial role in addressing these hazards by protecting cultural heritage, economic wealth and human lives.
Within the Horizon Europe project RescueME, which aims to foster resilience in coastal landscapes, predictive models were developed for four European areas, integrating ES into risk assessments. A modular framework was created, adopting a holistic approach by combining indicators of social, cultural as well as ecological dimensions to evaluate vulnerability.
The results reveal potential synergies/trade-offs among ES and mismatches between their distribution and social vulnerability, thus visualising environmental injustice.
Embedding ES into risk assessments highlights their value for territorial planning and disaster risk management, supporting the sustainable transformation of cultural landscapes.
CRED, UNDRR (2020), Human Cost of Disasters. An Overview of the Last 20 Years: 2000–2019, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) and United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). [https://www.undrr.org/publication/h...]
Hagenlocher M., Meza I., Anderson C.C., Min A., Renaud F.G. et al. (2019), “Drought vulnerability and risk assessments: State of the art, persistent gaps, and research agenda”, Environmental Research Letters, vol. 14, n. 8, p. 083002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab225d
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington D.C.
Natural Capital Project (2023), InVEST (Version 3.14.2) [Computer software], Stanford University, University of Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, Stockholm Resilience Centre e Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. [https://naturalcapitalproject.stanf...]
Ogden F.L., Crouch T.D., Stallard R.F., Hall J.S. (2013), “Effect of land cover and use on dry season river runoff, runoff efficiency, and peak storm runoff in the seasonal tropics of Central Panama”, Water Resources Research, vol. 49, n. 12, pp. 8443–8462. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR013956
Peng Y., Welden N., Renaud F.G. (2023), “A framework for integrating ecosystem services indicators into vulnerability and risk assessments of deltaic social-ecological systems”, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 326, p. 116682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116682
Peng Y., Welden N., Renaud F.G. (2024), “Incorporating ecosystem services into comparative vulnerability and risk assessments in the Pearl River and Yangtze River Deltas, China”, Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 249, p. 106980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106980
Sebesvari Z., Renaud F.G., Haas S., Tessler Z., Hagenlocher M. et al. (2016), “A review of vulnerability indicators for deltaic social–ecological systems”, Sustainability Science, vol. 11, n. 4, pp. 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0366-4
UN (2015), Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (General Assembly Resolution A/RES/70/1), United Nations, New York. [https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/f...]
UNDRR (2015), Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Geneva.
UNDRR (2016), Report of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Expert Working Group on Indicators and Terminology Relating to Disaster Risk Reduction, United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Geneva. [https://www.preventionweb.net/files...]