Dottorando URD, DIST/Politecnico di Torino
Questo studio analizza la distribuzione delle amenity a Torino e nelle aree limitrofe, utilizzando il principio della relatedness per comprendere le dinamiche di localizzazione. L’algoritmo di clustering definisce 41 livehood, aree urbane basate sulla compresenza di servizi. Lo spazio delle amenity mostra le correlazioni tra diverse tipologie di servizi, evidenziando cluster di ristorazione e abbigliamento nel centro di Torino. Il test del chi-quadro conferma la presenza di cluster di amenity in specifiche aree urbane, suggerendo che la progettazione urbana dovrebbe considerare queste dinamiche per migliorare la vivibilità. I risultati possono supportare le decisioni di pianificazione urbana, bilanciando il mix di amenity nei livehood e promuovendo uno sviluppo urbano sostenibile e inclusivo. Lo studio evidenzia anche le limitazioni dei dati utilizzati, sottolineando la necessità di ulteriori ricerche per migliorare la comprensione delle dinamiche urbane.
Abstract
Alonso L., Zhang Y. R., Grignard A., Noyman A., Sakai Y. et al. (2019), “Data-driven, evidence-based simulation of urban dynamics. Use case volpe”, Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX.
Bagnasco A., Antonelli C. (1990), La città dopo Ford: il caso di Torino, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
Berry B. J. L. (1967), Geography of market centers and retail distribution, Prentice Hall, New York
Bolzoni M., Semi G. (2023) “Adaptive urbanism in ordinary cities: Gentrification and temporalities in Turin (1993–2021)” Cities, vol. 134, 104144.
Boschma R. A., Fritsch M. (2009), “Creative class and regional growth: Empirical evidence from seven European countries”, Economic geography, vol. 85, no.4, p. 391-423.
Boschma R., Balland P. A., Kogler D. F. (2015), “Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010” Industrial and corporate change, vol.24, no. 1, p. 223-250.
Brueckner J. K. (1993), “Inter-store externalities and space allocation in shopping centers”, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, vol. 7, p. 5-16.
Brueckner J. K., Thisse J. F., Zenou Y. (1999), “Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor? An amenity-based theory” European economic review, vol.43, no. 1, p. 91-107.
Christaller W., Baskin C. W. (1966) Central places in southern Germany, Prentice Hall, New York.
Cranshaw J., Schwartz R., Hong J., Sadeh N. (2012), “The livehood project: Utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city” Proceedings of the international AAAI Conference on web and social media, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 58-65.
Di Pasquale D., Wheaton W. C. (1996). Urban economics and real estate markets, Pearson, Londra.
Dudey M. (1990), “Competition by choice: The effect of consumer search on firm location decisions”, The American Economic Review, p. 1092-1104.
Ehrenhalt A. (2012), The great inversion and the future of the American city. Knopf Publishing Group, New York.
Eppli M., Benjamin J. (1994), “The evolution of shopping center research: a review and analysis”, Journal of Real Estate Research, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 5-32.
Glaeser E. L., Kolko J., Saiz A. (2001), “Consumer city”, Journal of economic geography, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 27-50.
Guevara M. R., Hartmann D., Aristarán M., Mendoza
M., Hidalgo C. A. (2016), “The research space: using career paths to predict the evolution of the research output of individuals, institutions, and nations” Scientometrics, vol. 109, p. 1695-1709.
Handy S. L., Niemeier D. A. (1997), “Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives”, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, vol. 29 no. 7, p. 1175-1194.
Hernandez T., Bennison D. (2000), “The art and science of retail location decisions”, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 28, no. 8, p. 357-367.
Hidalgo C. A., Balland P. A., Boschma R., Delgado M., Feldman et al. (2018), “The principle of relatedness”, Unifying Themes in Complex Systems IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Complex Systems 9, p. 451-457.
Hidalgo C. A., Castañer E., Sevtsuk A. (2020), “The amenity mix of urban neighborhoods”, Habitat International, vol. 106, p. 102205.
Hotelling H. (1929), “Stability in competition”, The Economic Journal, vol. 39, no. 153, p. 41-57.
Ingene C. A. (1984), “Structural determinants of market potential”, Journal of Retailing, vol. 60(1), p. 37-64.
Li H., Wei Y. D., Wu Y. (2019), “Urban amenity, human capital and employment distribution in Shanghai” Habitat International, vol. 91, 102025.
Nagy D., Villaggi L., Benjamin D. (2018), “Generative urban design: integrating financial and energy goals for automated neighborhood layout”, Proceedings of the Symposium for Architecture and Urban Design, p. 265-274.
Nelson R. L. (1958), The selection of retail locations, F.W. Dodge, New York.
Noyman A., Doorley R., Xiong Z., Alonso L., Grignard A., et al. (2019), “Reversed urbanism: Inferring urban performance through behavioral patterns in temporal telecom data”, Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, vol. 46, no. 8, p. 1480-1498.
Olbricht R. M. (2015), “Data retrieval for small spatial regions in OpenStreetMap” GIScience: Experiences, Research, and Applications, p. 101-122.
Öner Ö. (2017), “Retail city: the relationship between place attractiveness and accessibility to shops” Spatial Economic Analysis, vol.12, no. 1, p. 72-91.
Rakha T., Reinhart C. (2012), “Generative urban modeling: a design work flow for walkability-optimized cities” proceedings of SimBuild, vol. 5, no. 1, p 255-262.
Schuetz J., Kolko J., Meltzer, R. (2012), “Are poor neighborhoods “retail deserts”?”, Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 42, no. 1-2, p. 269-285.
Schumacher P. (2009), “Parametricism: A new global style for architecture and urban design” Architectural Design, vol.79, no. 4, p. 14-23.
Sevtsuk A. (2014), “Location and agglomeration: The distribution of retail and food businesses in dense urban environments” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 34, no. 4, p. 374-393.
Sonta A. J., Jain R. K. (2019), “Optimizing neighborhood- scale walkability”, in ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering 2019, Future Cities and Resilient Infrastructures, Reston, 17-19 giugno, p. 454-461.
Yates, F. (1934), “Contingency tables involving small numbers and the x2 test”, Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol.1 no.2, p. 217-235.
